Zacht Ei
Doorbakken kan altijd nog |
![]() |
|
Friday, February 25, 2005
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry I have always got my news about the Netherlands from this site. But, since the comments by Pres. Putin, I decided to visit a few other Dutch news sites. I saw that a fellow was convicted, fined and put on probation for "insulting" a "group." Seems he had a web site on which he posted a writing from someone else who said the holocost never happened. Stupid opinion, but an opinion nevertheless. Since one cannot raally have a democracy without free speech, then perhaps Putin was right, afterall. That more than adequately explains why Theo von Gogh wanted to come to America. Theo was right. ttonn (ip:69.168.240.231) 25 February 2005 - 3:40 uur WW2 is a very sensitive issue in the Netherlands. After all, in no other European country was such a large percentage of the Jews decimated by the Germans. Although the Dutch tend to blame themselves either not enough (by making this an issue of privacy, putting all the blame on the precise government records we had in WW2) or too much (by ignoring the fact that the Netherlands were under the control of German civil authorities, rather than the less fanatic military, such as virtually all other countries they occupied), this has led to quite some paranoia about issues such as the one you're adressing. Arjan Dasselaar (ip:82.161.93.35) 25 February 2005 - 10:32 uur In response to my "riacti" (I like that) you opined " .....I don't agree that this limitation of our freedom of speech all of a sudden doesn't make us a democracy anymore." You are correct in a strict sense. I should have said "a true, just" democracy. After all, Northern Ireland is and was a democracy. All the laws persecuting Catholics were democratically enacted. The American south democratically passed desriminatory laws against blacks. Examples of bad democracies are almost infinite. The issue is quite simple. Should the State have the right to criminalize the expression of opinion? Should the state have the right to forbid me from saying the moon is made of Swiss cheese? Or that all Hotentots are sexual perverts? Or that the world is flat? If the state can regulate speech it can regulate thought. Every tyrant knows that. Democracy itself must be be predicated on certain protections or it becomes opressive. You are probably aware of the matter of Prof. Ward Churchill who said that America deserved 9/11 and that those killed in the twin towers were all "little Eichmanns." It has caused a firstorm of controversy, needless to say. But it is not and never will never be the subject of a criminal prosecution. That is as it should be. Nothing like the following could ever happen in the U.S. as it is happening in the Netherlands. "Newspaper Charged With Blasphemy ttonn (ip:69.168.240.231) 25 February 2005 - 7:16 uur Putin pulled the same thing with the United States claiming our electoral college was comparible to his "reforms" in Russia. Douglas (ip:207.237.254.216) 25 February 2005 - 8:35 uur Comment
|
||||||||||||||