Zacht Ei

Doorbakken kan altijd nog


Saturday, May 14, 2005

Say no to Europe: Why this referendum is about the euro

The Dutch government is getting frightened. They've allocated an extra 3.5 million euros for pro-constitution propaganda. It's a good thing that (thanks to Europe) this hardly buys you a sandwich anymore these days. Meanwhile, they keep on repeating the same old arguments why we should vote in favour.

Because we'll get left behind in Europe. A lie - every country that ever threw a tantrum in the EU only got more perks. Think Thatcher.

Because we'll get another Auschwitz. A lie - rejecting the constitution only keeps the EU in its current state. It doesn't disolve the Union.

And because this isn't about the euro. The biggest lie of all.

True, rejecting the constitution won't bring back the guilder. But we were cheated back then. First, by allowing Greece into the Economical and Monetary Union while their economy didn't meet the criteria. Second, by diluting the guilder to 90 percent of its real value only to please Germany.

We were robbed. And you simply don't make new deals with people who've cheated you in the past without them having made amends or even having offered an apology.

In other words, saying that this referendum isn't about the euro is the same as a salesman telling you there's nothing wrong with his camper vans, while you are still paying off the garage bills for the crappy car he sold you back in 1999.

(So there's still no reason yet not to declare war on Iran.)

11:16

permalink comment(s) (1) trackback(s) (0)


« 

Good news from Iraq   Say no to Europe: Sensible civil servant surfaces

 »


Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry


I'm glad that despite the title you make clear the euro itself isn't the key element, it is the lack of trust we (rightfully) have in the institutions involved.

When researching the common defence policy and NATO's role, I had to go back and forth a dozen of articles to discover only three really mattered. They were written in such a way that it looks like the EU respects NATO, but with plenty of room left for an interpretation where even non-NATO members could actually influence or delay NATO through the EU.

Regardless of whether that's a good or bad thing (I'd say it's pretty bad), the mere fact that the document is so obfuscated should be a good reason to vote 'no'.

Robert John Kaper (ip:213.84.48.90) 14 May 2005 - 22:27 uur


Comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(By submitting comments you agree to have read and accepted the forum rules. If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)



Remember me?