Zacht Ei
Doorbakken kan altijd nog |
![]() |
|
Sunday, August 28, 2005
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry Problem is the dikes (levees) that protect the Netherlands are a different animal than the ones that protect New Orleans. Southern Louisiana was built up on silt brought down the Mississipi River. The levees built 50+ years ago cut off this silt, causing southern Louisiana to sink. A city like Amsterdam has a future. I think New Orleans will have to be written off. Even if New Orleans dodges this bullet, there will be future Katrinas. It's possible to build levees big enough to protect New Orleans, but there will be a point where the economic benefits don't meet the expense. Every time I got to New Orleans I get a wierd feeling sitting in the French Quarter and watching ships go by on the Mississipi River, and the ships are floating by ABOVE me. LouMinatti (ip:70.241.99.105) 28 August 2005 - 4:17 uur With that said, if there are any Dutch engineers with brilliant ideas on how to solve this problem I am sure the Mayor of New Orleans would like to speak with them. :-) LouMinatti (ip:70.241.99.105) 28 August 2005 - 4:18 uur I think you have a point. I'm pretty sure Dutch engineers could come up with something, I'm not too sure it would be cheap. The Delta Works were quite expensive, but that didn't matter too much. Our country is very small, surrendering nearly half of it to the sea is simply not an option. Arjan Dasselaar (ip:82.161.93.35) 28 August 2005 - 19:39 uur Paging Dutch civil engineers! After what happened in New Orleans today your expertise will be wanted! That is, if they decide to rebuild. LouMinatti (ip:70.241.116.206) 28 August 2005 - 2:41 uur Comment
|
||||||||||||||